Editorial Policy

Our standards

Every piece of content on Peptide Nerds follows strict editorial guidelines designed to ensure accuracy, transparency, and usefulness.

Research sourcing

• Medical and scientific claims are supported by peer-reviewed studies published in indexed journals.
• PubMed IDs (PMIDs) are provided for referenced studies so readers can verify sources directly.
• When evidence is preliminary, anecdotal, or based on animal studies, this is clearly stated.
• We distinguish between FDA-approved compounds, those in clinical trials, and research-only peptides.

Content review process

• All content is reviewed for medical accuracy before publication.
• FDA compliance scanning checks for banned claims and ensures proper disclaimers.
• Content is scored across six dimensions: SEO, medical accuracy, compliance, readability, E-E-A-T signals, and engagement.
• Posts must score 85/100 or higher to be published.

Transparency

• We clearly disclose when content contains affiliate links.
• Sponsored content (if any) is labeled as such.
• The author's personal experience is clearly distinguished from clinical evidence.
• We state conflicts of interest when they exist.

Updates and corrections

Peptide research evolves rapidly. We review and update content regularly. If you find an error or outdated information, contact us and we will investigate promptly.

What we do not do

• We do not make therapeutic claims for non-FDA-approved compounds.
• We do not recommend specific vendors or sources for research peptides.
• We do not provide personalized medical advice.
• We do not guarantee results from any peptide protocol.